AI

Ripple-65B Preview: 65B Dense Open Model, Benchmarks, Apache 2.0

Ripple-65B Preview: 65B Dense Open Model, Benchmarks, Apache 2.0
Ripple-65B Preview by Ricursive Intelligence with its 65 billion parameter dense architecture and Terminal-Bench 2.1 score.

November 6, 2026 | AI | By Mahesh

Ricursive Intelligence released Ripple-65B Preview on November 4, 2026, an Apache 2.0 open-weight language model with 65 billion dense parameters trained from scratch on 12 trillion tokens.[1] The chip design startup says the model scores 80.52 on Terminal-Bench 2.1, the highest figure among US open-weight models, while carrying a fraction of the parameters of the rivals it passes.[1][3] The weights are on Hugging Face, and Together AI serves the model through an API.[1][2]

1,048,576
Context window (tokens, per model card)
$0.20 / $0.60
Together AI price per million tokens (In/Out)
80.52
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (vendor-reported)
Apache 2.0
Open-weight license, no extra terms
Key Takeaways
  • Core novelty: a 65B dense model that Ricursive says beats 501B to 975B mixture-of-experts models on Terminal-Bench 2.1 and SWE-bench Pro v2.0 Hard.
  • Pricing and availability: Apache 2.0 weights on Hugging Face, plus a hosted API on Together AI at $0.20 input and $0.60 output per million tokens.
  • Key limitation: this is a Preview with light post-training, and it trails rivals on SWE-bench Verified, DeepSWE, SciCode and MCP Atlas in Ricursive's own table.

What is new in Ripple-65B Preview

Ripple-65B Preview is the first public language model from Ricursive Intelligence, a general-purpose variant of the model behind its AI chip design platform and tuned for agentic coding.[2] It is dense, so all 65 billion parameters run on every token, unlike the mixture-of-experts rivals it is compared against.[1] Ricursive says it chose a dense design to cut training and serving complexity.[1]

The release has three checkpoints: an instruction-tuned BF16 model, an experimental NVFP4 build aimed at local hardware such as the NVIDIA DGX Spark and a BF16 base model that is pretrain-only.[1] Ricursive says the Preview label reflects relatively light post-training with a focus on agentic coding, so the instruct model should be read as a first cut.[1]

"our 65B dense LLM we pretrained from scratch"
Ricursive Intelligence, Official Announcement on X [3]

Ricursive also makes efficiency claims. It reports a 16x compute efficiency gain on code over its Olmo 3 baseline ladder, rising to 55x for the full run. It also cites a $32 million compute budget, which it calls one tenth of the cost of the previous open-weight leader in agentic coding.[1][3] Those cost figures come from the company and have no independent audit. The team grew from one to five people during development.[1]

Under the hood: architecture and specifications

Ripple-65B Preview is a 65 billion parameter dense Transformer with 80 layers, a model dimension of 5,120 and support for up to 1,048,576 tokens of context.[1][2] The table below collects the published specifications.

SpecificationRipple-65B Preview
DeveloperRicursive Intelligence
ArchitectureDense Transformer, 65B total and 65B active parameters
Layers and width80 layers, d_model 5,120 (thin and deep)
Pretraining data12 trillion tokens of text and code, mostly English
Context lengthUp to 1,048,576 tokens (Together lists 128K on its hosted spec sheet)
ModalitiesText input and text output
Knowledge cutoffDecember 17, 2025
CheckpointsInstruct BF16, Instruct NVFP4, Base BF16
LicenseApache 2.0

The design departs from the Olmo 3 llama-like baseline. Ricursive moved to a Gemma 3N-like architecture for training stability at scale, added more attention heads than usual, raised the ratio of sliding-window to global attention layers and shrank the window to offset the cost.[1] It also added FFN activation clipping, gated attention, global NoPE and value residuals.[1]

Pretraining ran for 877,500 steps at 8K sequence length, followed by a 200 billion token midtraining stage at 64K, long-context training, 183 billion tokens of supervised fine-tuning and 700 steps of reinforcement learning at 128K.[1] Together AI reports 1.4 million reinforcement learning rollouts behind the Terminal-Bench result.[2] Ricursive says it held 40% model FLOPs utilization with simple sharding, no custom kernels and no quantization, and reports 250 tokens per second on two B200 GPUs at batch size 8 before any optimization.[1]

Benchmarks and performance: reported results against marketing claims

Ricursive reports 80.52 on Terminal-Bench 2.1, ahead of Reflection Beam 501B at 80.1, Meta Muse Spark Open 816B at 76.4, Thinking Machines Inkling 975B at 63.8 and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B at 56.4.[1] The comparison covers US open-weight models, and Ricursive ran all of them at full BF16 precision and maximum effort.[1]

BenchmarkRipple-65B PreviewReflection Beam 501BMuse Spark Open 816BInkling 975BNemotron 3 Ultra 550B
Active parameters65B23B42B41B55B
Terminal-Bench 2.1 (self-reported)80.580.176.463.856.4
SWE-bench Pro v2.0 Hard79.176.552.32.030.7
SWE-bench Verified76.581.678.777.671.9
DeepSWE 1.144.343.360.01.80.2
GPQA Diamond85.290.689.087.287.0
SciCode39.449.258.546.144.6
MCP Atlas71.6780.889.276.062.2

Source: Ricursive Intelligence model card. Some rival scores come from Ricursive's own evaluation runs rather than official model cards.[1]

The card carries a caveat that matters for anyone reproducing the headline number. Ricursive found that Terminal-Bench 2.1 scores came out lower for nearly every model, Muse Spark Open excepted, when using the official Terminus 2 harness at 128K sequence length with summarization.[1] It describes its table as a best-effort fair comparison, and it filled missing rival scores with its in-house evaluation flow.[1]

Outside terminal work the picture is mixed. Ripple leads SWE-bench Pro v2.0 Hard at 79.1 against 76.5 for Reflection Beam, yet scores 44.3 on DeepSWE 1.1 against 60.0 for Muse Spark Open and 39.4 on SciCode against 58.5.[1] On competition math it posts 98.3 on AIME 2025 and 95.0 on AIME 2026.[1] No independent evaluation had surfaced at the time of writing, so every figure here is vendor-reported.

Pricing, availability and how to access Ripple-65B Preview

Together AI lists Ripple-65B Preview at $0.20 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens, with cached input at $0.02 per million.[2] The endpoint name is ricursive-ai/Ripple-65B-Preview, and Together supports reasoning and tool calling for agentic coding workflows.[2] Its spec sheet shows a 128K context window even though the model supports up to 1M, so check each provider's limit before planning long-context work.[2]

Developers who want to self-host can download the BF16 instruct weights, the NVFP4 build or the base model from Hugging Face under Apache 2.0.[1][4] A BF16 copy of 65 billion parameters is about 130 GB by simple arithmetic, which fits on a multi-GPU server and exceeds a single consumer card. Ricursive points to the NVFP4 build and a Colab notebook for local experiments.[1] Ricursive's launch post also names OpenRouter and GMI Cloud as API partners.[3]

Limitations, trade-offs and competitive alternatives

Ripple-65B Preview is a text-only, mostly English model with light post-training, and its Hugging Face repository carries a custom code tag, which means loading it may require trusting remote code.[1] The base model also trails DeepSeek V4 Flash and Nemotron 3 Ultra on several traditional pretraining evaluations in Ricursive's own base table, such as MMLU-Pro and MATH.[1] Teams that need strong tool use should note the MCP Atlas gap of 71.67 against 89.2 for Muse Spark Open.[1]

Larger open-weight options include Tencent's 770 billion parameter model in Tencent Hy4: 770B MoE, 1M Context, 6 Yuan per Million Tokens and the 1.05 trillion parameter preview in Mistral Large 4 Preview: 1.05T Open-Weight MoE, Specs and Pricing. Moonshot's 2.8 trillion parameter Kimi K3.1 Pro also shipped open weights this week. Ripple is the option to test when serving cost and a permissive license matter more than the last few points on every benchmark.

Sources

  1. Ricursive Intelligence. "Ripple-65B Preview model card, benchmarks and training details," Hugging Face, November 4, 2026. huggingface.co and launch blog
  2. Together AI. "Ripple-65B Preview API: Pricing, Benchmarks and Docs." together.ai
  3. Ricursive Intelligence. Launch announcement thread on X, November 4 and 5, 2026. x.com
  4. Ricursive Intelligence. "Apache 2.0 license and NVFP4 checkpoint," Hugging Face. license and NVFP4 repository

Read More on Depth Grid

Article by Mahesh | Depth Grid

Discussion (0)

Comments are disabled for this post.