AI

Inception Mercury 3: 1,068 Tokens/s Diffusion LLM, $0.20 Input

Inception Mercury 3: 1,068 Tokens/s Diffusion LLM, $0.20 Input
Inception Mercury 3 specification card showing 1,068 tokens per second, a 1M token context window and $0.20 per million input token pricing.


October 20, 2026 | AI | By Mahesh

Inception, the startup behind the Mercury diffusion language models, launched Mercury 3 on October 19, 2026, a model that generates text at 1,068 tokens per second on NVIDIA GPUs with a 1 million token context window [1][2]. It costs $0.20 per million input tokens and $0.70 per million output tokens, with a 50% launch discount, and is available only through an API with closed weights [2]. Inception says it matches or beats GPT-6 Luna and Claude Haiku 5.5, and nearly all of those numbers are Inception's own.

1M
Context window (tokens), up from 260K
$0.20 / $0.70
List price per million tokens (input / output)
1,068
Tokens per second, Inception-measured
API only
Closed weights, no self-hosting

What Mercury 3 is and what is new

Mercury 3 is a diffusion LLM. It drafts a full answer and refines every position in parallel over a few passes, where a conventional model generates one token at a time [2]. Inception says the model has more than 40 times the total parameters of Mercury 1 and that its intelligence on standard benchmarks has risen about threefold since the first Mercury mini [1]. The context window grows from 260,000 tokens in Mercury 2.5 to 1 million.

Inception argues that Mercury 3 shows text diffusion scales, and that scaling laws seen in autoregressive models also hold for diffusion [1]. The launch includes two companion products. Mercury Voice targets time to first answer token in voice apps, and Mercury Decide is a classification model for high-volume decisions [1].

"In our Sense API tests, Octen search took about 80ms; model generation was the bottleneck."
Kuan Zou, Founder and CEO, Octen AI, in Inception's announcement [1]

Under the hood: diffusion, size and serving

Inception has not disclosed the parameter count, the architecture details or the exact GPU behind the speed figure [1][2]. The 1,068 tokens per second is Inception's measurement on its own NVIDIA GPU serving stack, and it claims a speed advantage of 4 to 8 times over comparable models [1][2]. In an Octen AI test, median generation time was 0.9 seconds and median end-to-end response time 2.2 seconds [1].

The model string is mercury-3 and the API follows the OpenAI format with a reasoning_effort parameter, so it can replace an existing model in a stack with little change [2]. Early partners use it for voice and chat support, tutoring, data engineering and web navigation [1].

Benchmarks: vendor tests and one outside spot check

Inception says Mercury 3 leads in 8 of 12 tests against GPT-6 Luna and Claude Haiku 5.5, all at medium settings, and the speed figures for the rival models are also Inception's measurements [2]. Some of the larger gaps and the cases where it trails are below.

Benchmark (Inception-run)Mercury 3Claude Haiku 5.5GPT-6 Luna
SWE-Bench Atlas51.0832.2633.33
IFBench76.8454.6561.82
GPQA Diamond89.2384.5186.36
DeepSWE v146.3151.62n/r
MRCR v275.5078.40n/r

Haiku 5.5 leads on DeepSWE v1 and MRCR v2, which points to long-context retrieval and longer coding tasks as the weak spots [2]. Depth Grid covered that rival in Claude Haiku 5.5 Launch: $0.10 Input, 1M Context, Benchmarks. Inception also reports that Mercury 3 completed 50% of 50 live Mind2Web browser tasks in TinyFish's agent harness, using the same token volume and steps as a frontier model, a customer test that has not been independently verified [1][3].

Corey Noles of The Neuron ran eight spot checks through OpenRouter for a total cost of about $0.04. The model wrote a working single-file dungeon game and solved a logic puzzle correctly, but it overshot a 250-word limit by about 24 words and, in a hallucination test, added an incorrect claim about 1986 to 1988 Shuttle launches after three web searches [3]. He did not reproduce the speed figure and calls the checks practical, not a controlled benchmark.

Pricing, availability and how to access it

List price is $0.20 per million input tokens and $0.70 per million output tokens. The launch promotion halves that to $0.10 and $0.35, and cached input costs 90% less than the input price. New accounts on the Inception API platform get 100 million free tokens [1][2][3]. The launch discount is temporary, so costs roughly double when it ends [2].

Mercury 3 is available through the Inception API, OpenRouter, Baseten and Vercel AI Gateway, and in Mercury Chat for a quick test. Enterprise plans add dedicated capacity, autoscaling, compliance controls and configurable data retention [1][2]. Weights are closed, so there is no self-hosting.

Limitations, trade-offs and alternatives

The Neuron found imperfect control of exact word counts and setting rules, explanations that sound more certain than warranted and errors when tool-assisted answers pulled in web results [3]. Inception's page lists no limitations, and the speed, benchmark and agent figures are vendor-run or customer statements [1][2].

For buyers who want open weights, Depth Grid has covered Mistral Large 4, and for a closed model at a higher price, Meta Muse Wonder. Teams that want speed for voice, chat or agent loops should test Mercury 3 on their own prompts and compare cost per finished task, not tokens per second.

Sources

  1. Inception. "Diffusion at Scale: Introducing Mercury 3," October 19, 2026. inceptionlabs.ai
  2. MarkTechPost. "Inception Releases Mercury 3 Diffusion LLM at 1,068 Tokens per Second," October 19, 2026. marktechpost.com
  3. Corey Noles, The Neuron. "Mercury 3 Review: Inception's Diffusion AI Put to the Test," October 20, 2026. theneuron.ai

Read More on Depth Grid

About the author
Mahesh, Editor and Lead Analyst at Depth Grid. Read his full profile.

Article by Mahesh | Depth Grid

Discussion (0)

Comments are disabled for this post.